fix: lints

deps/db/src/logseq/db/frontend/property/type.cljs

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
   (when-let [ent (d/entity db val)]
     (some? (:block/original-name ent))))
 
-(defn- object?
+(defn- object-entity?
   [db val]
   (when-let [ent (d/entity db val)]
     (seq (:block/tags ent))))
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
               page?]
    :object   [:fn
               {:error/message "should be a page/block with tags"}
-              object?]
+              object-entity?]
    ;; TODO: strict check on template
    :template [:fn
               {:error/message "should has #template"}

deps/outliner/src/logseq/outliner/core.cljs

@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
             [malli.core :as m]
             [malli.util :as mu]
             [logseq.db :as ldb]
-            [logseq.graph-parser.block :as gp-block]
             [logseq.graph-parser.property :as gp-property]
             [logseq.graph-parser.db :as gp-db]
             [logseq.db.frontend.property.util :as db-property-util]

src/main/frontend/components/property.cljs

@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@
 
           (when (db-property-type/property-type-allows-schema-attribute? (:type @*property-schema) :classes)
             (case (:type @*property-schema)
-              ;; Question: 1. should we still suppport classes for `page` type?
+              ;; Question: 1. should we still support classes for `page` type?
               ;;           2. flexible query instead of classes? e.g. find all papers are related to either Clojure or OCaml `(and (tag :paper) (or (tag :clojure) (tag :ocaml)))`
               :object
               (when (empty? (:property/closed-values property))