|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
|
|
|
+Important things to consider if you want to contribute to the project (or any
|
|
|
+project in general, programming language and programming style aside)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+On authors, maintainers, and contributing:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - If you want to write in a nice new contribution/feature, that's awesome, and
|
|
|
+ I fully encourage it. However, unless what you make is very easy to
|
|
|
+ maintain, do not submit a feature or module for distribution with the main
|
|
|
+ project if you don't plan on supporting it or maintaining it yourself. This
|
|
|
+ is *especially* important if it's big. Smaller features and contributions
|
|
|
+ that are simple to understand/maintain can get away with this, but
|
|
|
+ generally, other people do not want to have to fix your code if something
|
|
|
+ breaks.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ I completely understand that you may have a busy life outside of the
|
|
|
+ project, but if what you submit can go wrong, it will go wrong. If you
|
|
|
+ don't have time to fix major problems, then you probably shouldn't be
|
|
|
+ contributing to the project (or any project) in the first place.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - Be prepared to work with other contibutors. If you are venturing in to
|
|
|
+ someone else's code (to improve/expand upon it, or to change it for the
|
|
|
+ better), be prepared to talk and work with that person, whomever it may be.
|
|
|
+ Do *not* go rewriting someone elses code from scratch just because you feel
|
|
|
+ you can do it better, Instead, examine what they did, talk with the person
|
|
|
+ (constructively) and if possible work with them to try to improve their
|
|
|
+ existing code.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ This may require you to have some level of people skills. That *doesn't*
|
|
|
+ mean you should have to take someone else's bullshit if they're being an
|
|
|
+ asshole or being completely unreasonable, but it does mean that you should
|
|
|
+ be somewhat civil and try to work together.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - Be prepared to work with testers/users, sometimes you *have* to talk to
|
|
|
+ users and go over the problem and find the solution. Users don't always
|
|
|
+ know what they're doing, but I've found that most are more than willing to
|
|
|
+ be patient and follow your instructions to help you debug the problem for
|
|
|
+ mutual benefit. They will sing praises of you for fixing their problems,
|
|
|
+ and you will have one less problem to deal with. You'll find that the
|
|
|
+ community is awesome and filled with some amazing people. Work with them,
|
|
|
+ cherish them, because they are truly what make the wheels of your project
|
|
|
+ spin. For that reason, do *not* treat users badly, ever.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - The author(s)/maintainer(s) often get the last say on big/important
|
|
|
+ decisions for the project as a whole. A good maintainer will always listen,
|
|
|
+ and will often ask others on the project for their opinions. At the same
|
|
|
+ time, don't always expect everything to be democratic. Each individual
|
|
|
+ project has its own rules, but more often than not it's probably more like a
|
|
|
+ benevolent dictatorship. If that is the case and you have an opinion about
|
|
|
+ a particular upcoming change/decision, simply talk with the maintainers
|
|
|
+ about your opinion, and unless it ventures too far outside of whatever
|
|
|
+ 'project vision' they have, they usually are (and should be) more than
|
|
|
+ willing to take your personal opinions in to account for the sake of the
|
|
|
+ project as a whole.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Just keep in mind that there are always many subjective topics, and that
|
|
|
+ like anything that's subjective, there often will be differing opinions that
|
|
|
+ may not always become resolved.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - However, that being said, do try to avoid taking up too much of the
|
|
|
+ maintainer's time on any given discussion. Try to be to be as concise as
|
|
|
+ possible, as they're often pretty busy, especially if they are doing most of
|
|
|
+ the work on the project (which is almost always the case).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Styles, formatting, and guidelines for code
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - You may use C, C++. or Objective-C (for apple) to create your modules,
|
|
|
+ though please try to use C unless an API you're using requires C++ or
|
|
|
+ Objective-C (such as windows COM classes, or apple Objetive-C APIs). Some
|
|
|
+ maintainers may be lax with this (such as myself), but unless you plan on
|
|
|
+ always being there to maintain the code, it's generally best to use C so
|
|
|
+ everybody has common ground to work with. Language is a very personal thing
|
|
|
+ and not everyone will agree, but it's something that is ultimately the
|
|
|
+ decision of the author(s)/maintainer(s). Arguing about language in this
|
|
|
+ instance will only seek to annoy them.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - Coding style is mostly KNF (linux-style). We're using KNF because it's an
|
|
|
+ established, well known style with the purpose of reducing bugs and
|
|
|
+ improving readability in a variety of circumstances. This means K&R, 80
|
|
|
+ columns max, preferable maximum function length of 42 lines, 8 character
|
|
|
+ width tabs, lower_case_names, etc. I chose this for the sake of the
|
|
|
+ project, don't argue about it, don't talk to me about it, just do it. If
|
|
|
+ you can't deal with it, then you probably shouldn't be contributing to any
|
|
|
+ projects period, because every good project has coding guidelines.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ See https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/CodingStyle for a general
|
|
|
+ guideline (though not necessarily a rulebook, for example we allow the use
|
|
|
+ of boolean return values instead of ints for failure).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - C++ is an exception to the lower_case_only rule, CamelCase is encouraged
|
|
|
+ (though not required) to distinguish it from C code. Just a personal and
|
|
|
+ subjective stylistic thing on my part.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - Do not use dependencies for the sake of convenience. Use them only if you
|
|
|
+ actually have a real need to depend on them. Just because the user
|
|
|
+ interface code depends on some toolkit doesn't mean it's okay for your
|
|
|
+ module to use that toolkit just so you can use some class or template they
|
|
|
+ have that you enjoy using. Use the standard language libraries and use
|
|
|
+ what's available in the core.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - Core is C only (unless there's an operating specific thing that requires
|
|
|
+ another language). I will especially not accept any code in the core that
|
|
|
+ does not abide by these rules. I will be particularly uptight about the
|
|
|
+ core.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+About these guidelines
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - These guidelines, the coding style, the format are for the sake of the
|
|
|
+ project and everyone who contributes and helps maintain the project. They
|
|
|
+ are not done so much for the sake of myself as the maintainer, but for the
|
|
|
+ sake of everyone. These guidelines helps ensure better code, better
|
|
|
+ conitribution, better cooperation, and code that (hopefully) everyone can
|
|
|
+ contribute to on some measure of even ground. Everyone has their own
|
|
|
+ personal style but sometimes there just has to be common ground for the sake
|
|
|
+ of the project as a whole.
|