| .. |
|
Operators
|
af6a43d236
Use ValueTask for internal IAsyncPartition interface.
|
7 years ago |
|
AsyncEnumerable.cs
|
fc3552e2e2
Fix some namespaces.
|
7 years ago |
|
AsyncEnumerableHelpers.cs
|
d10837ce07
Tame concurrency in Except and Intersect.
|
7 years ago |
|
AsyncEnumerablePartition.cs
|
af6a43d236
Use ValueTask for internal IAsyncPartition interface.
|
7 years ago |
|
AsyncEnumerator.cs
|
3a3c59ba42
Change signature of Clone.
|
7 years ago |
|
AsyncIterator.Opt.cs
|
aacb761f40
Switch to ValueTask for predicates, selectors, etc. We await those ourselves and they are expected to be called in a high-frequency manner, so this seems to be the right choice. The only drawback is when these operators are used using method group conversion of a Task-returning async method, which is likely rare in query expressions where one typically uses (async) lambdas, and there's a workaround Task-to-ValueTask conversion. We can't overload on ValueTask and Task return types, so this seems the best way forward.
|
7 years ago |
|
AsyncIterator.cs
|
65fd9d0201
Add performance remarks.
|
7 years ago |
|
AsyncListPartition.cs
|
af6a43d236
Use ValueTask for internal IAsyncPartition interface.
|
7 years ago |
|
Disposables.cs
|
b53998f1d6
More code cleanup.
|
7 years ago |
|
EmptyArray.cs
|
1a7192b640
Moving Standard Query Operators to System.Linq.Async.
|
8 years ago |
|
IAsyncGrouping.cs
|
1c69583ffa
Moving interfaces to System.Linq.Async.
|
8 years ago |
|
IAsyncIListProvider.cs
|
ada8a64036
Renaming IIListProvider to IAsyncIListProvider.
|
8 years ago |
|
IAsyncPartition.cs
|
af6a43d236
Use ValueTask for internal IAsyncPartition interface.
|
7 years ago |
|
IOrderedAsyncEnumerable.cs
|
aacb761f40
Switch to ValueTask for predicates, selectors, etc. We await those ourselves and they are expected to be called in a high-frequency manner, so this seems to be the right choice. The only drawback is when these operators are used using method group conversion of a Task-returning async method, which is likely rare in query expressions where one typically uses (async) lambdas, and there's a workaround Task-to-ValueTask conversion. We can't overload on ValueTask and Task return types, so this seems the best way forward.
|
7 years ago |
|
Maybe.cs
|
394f37e0b4
Fix Maybe<T>.
|
7 years ago |
|
Set.cs
|
24e92b0414
Remove UnionWithAsync.
|
7 years ago |