| .. |
|
AsyncLockTest.cs
|
a9e2277be5
Remove a wrapper for AsyncLock in the corresponding test. It is unclear why that was useful once... (#552)
|
пре 7 година |
|
ConcurrencyTest.cs
|
da3b5ed03e
move files to src\tests\facades
|
пре 8 година |
|
ControlSchedulerTest.cs
|
da3b5ed03e
move files to src\tests\facades
|
пре 8 година |
|
CurrentThreadSchedulerTest.cs
|
c0220bbc0b
Removing conditional compilation for Silverlight.
|
пре 8 година |
|
DefaultSchedulerTest.cs
|
2de07f26b5
modernizations
|
пре 8 година |
|
DispatcherSchedulerTest.cs
|
c0220bbc0b
Removing conditional compilation for Silverlight.
|
пре 8 година |
|
EventLoopSchedulerTest.cs
|
fef06a9a86
Merge pull request #364 from Reactive-Extensions/RemoveSilverlight
|
пре 8 година |
|
HistoricalSchedulerTest.cs
|
da3b5ed03e
move files to src\tests\facades
|
пре 8 година |
|
ImmediateSchedulerTest.cs
|
c0220bbc0b
Removing conditional compilation for Silverlight.
|
пре 8 година |
|
NewThreadSchedulerTest.cs
|
c0220bbc0b
Removing conditional compilation for Silverlight.
|
пре 8 година |
|
ScheduledItemTest.cs
|
da3b5ed03e
move files to src\tests\facades
|
пре 8 година |
|
SchedulerTest.cs
|
569d81d38f
Rename and reorder the signature of the extension for schedule that takes an Action<TState> and a state. Reordering the signature without renaming would cause ambiguities. (#564)
|
пре 7 година |
|
StopwatchTest.cs
|
bc77800155
Removing check for absence of Stopwatch.
|
пре 8 година |
|
SynchronizationContextSchedulerTest.cs
|
c0220bbc0b
Removing conditional compilation for Silverlight.
|
пре 8 година |
|
SynchronizationTest.cs
|
9a3f8a3626
Removing a few conditional compilation symbols.
|
пре 8 година |
|
TaskPoolSchedulerTest.cs
|
adbb3d1102
Removing conditional compilation for TPL.
|
пре 8 година |
|
ThreadPoolSchedulerTest.cs
|
2de07f26b5
modernizations
|
пре 8 година |
|
VirtualSchedulerTest.cs
|
c0220bbc0b
Removing conditional compilation for Silverlight.
|
пре 8 година |
Daniel C. Weber
a9e2277be5
Remove a wrapper for AsyncLock in the corresponding test. It is unclear why that was useful once... (#552)