|
@@ -1,74 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
-http://bugs.gentoo.org/392645
|
|
|
-http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-2011-12-03 Alan Modra <[email protected]>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- PR ld/13470
|
|
|
- * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Revert substantive
|
|
|
- change in 2011-07-01 commit. Comment.
|
|
|
- * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Likewise.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-===================================================================
|
|
|
-RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-ppc.c,v
|
|
|
-retrieving revision 1.302.2.1
|
|
|
-retrieving revision 1.302.2.2
|
|
|
---- a/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
|
|
|
-+++ b/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
|
|
|
-@@ -2987,10 +2987,6 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd
|
|
|
- edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
|
|
|
- edir->elf.pointer_equality_needed |= eind->elf.pointer_equality_needed;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */
|
|
|
-- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
|
|
-- return;
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
- if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
|
|
|
- {
|
|
|
- if (edir->dyn_relocs != NULL)
|
|
|
-@@ -3022,6 +3018,16 @@ ppc_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct bfd
|
|
|
- eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-+ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
|
|
|
-+ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all,
|
|
|
-+ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
|
|
|
-+ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
|
|
|
-+ code in ppc_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
|
|
|
-+ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
|
|
|
-+ DIR sym here. */
|
|
|
-+ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
|
|
-+ return;
|
|
|
-+
|
|
|
- /* Copy over the GOT refcount entries that we may have already seen to
|
|
|
- the symbol which just became indirect. */
|
|
|
- edir->elf.got.refcount += eind->elf.got.refcount;
|
|
|
---- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
|
|
|
-+++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
|
|
|
-@@ -4435,10 +4435,6 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b
|
|
|
- edir->elf.ref_regular_nonweak |= eind->elf.ref_regular_nonweak;
|
|
|
- edir->elf.needs_plt |= eind->elf.needs_plt;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all. */
|
|
|
-- if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
|
|
-- return;
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
- /* Copy over any dynamic relocs we may have on the indirect sym. */
|
|
|
- if (eind->dyn_relocs != NULL)
|
|
|
- {
|
|
|
-@@ -4471,6 +4467,16 @@ ppc64_elf_copy_indirect_symbol (struct b
|
|
|
- eind->dyn_relocs = NULL;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-+ /* If we were called to copy over info for a weak sym, that's all.
|
|
|
-+ You might think dyn_relocs need not be copied over; After all,
|
|
|
-+ both syms will be dynamic or both non-dynamic so we're just
|
|
|
-+ moving reloc accounting around. However, ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS
|
|
|
-+ code in ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol needs to check for
|
|
|
-+ dyn_relocs in read-only sections, and it does so on what is the
|
|
|
-+ DIR sym here. */
|
|
|
-+ if (eind->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_indirect)
|
|
|
-+ return;
|
|
|
-+
|
|
|
- /* Copy over got entries that we may have already seen to the
|
|
|
- symbol which just became indirect. */
|
|
|
- if (eind->elf.got.glist != NULL)
|