fix thinko in 102-ehci_hcd_ignore_oc patch

SVN-Revision: 29773

target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.39/102-ehci_hcd_ignore_oc.patch

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
  	 * PORT_POWER; that's surprising, but maybe within-spec.
  	 */
 -	if (!ignore_oc)
-+	if (!ignore_oc || !ehci->ignore_oc)
++	if (!ignore_oc && !ehci->ignore_oc)
  		mask = PORT_CSC | PORT_PEC | PORT_OCC;
  	else
  		mask = PORT_CSC | PORT_PEC;
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  			status |= USB_PORT_STAT_C_ENABLE << 16;
  
 -		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && !ignore_oc){
-+		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && (!ignore_oc || !ehci->ignore_oc)){
++		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && (!ignore_oc && !ehci->ignore_oc)){
  			status |= USB_PORT_STAT_C_OVERCURRENT << 16;
  
  			/*

target/linux/generic/patches-3.0/102-ehci_hcd_ignore_oc.patch

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
  	 * PORT_POWER; that's surprising, but maybe within-spec.
  	 */
 -	if (!ignore_oc)
-+	if (!ignore_oc || !ehci->ignore_oc)
++	if (!ignore_oc && !ehci->ignore_oc)
  		mask = PORT_CSC | PORT_PEC | PORT_OCC;
  	else
  		mask = PORT_CSC | PORT_PEC;
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  			status |= USB_PORT_STAT_C_ENABLE << 16;
  
 -		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && !ignore_oc){
-+		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && (!ignore_oc || !ehci->ignore_oc)){
++		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && (!ignore_oc && !ehci->ignore_oc)){
  			status |= USB_PORT_STAT_C_OVERCURRENT << 16;
  
  			/*

target/linux/generic/patches-3.1/102-ehci_hcd_ignore_oc.patch

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
  	 * PORT_POWER; that's surprising, but maybe within-spec.
  	 */
 -	if (!ignore_oc)
-+	if (!ignore_oc || !ehci->ignore_oc)
++	if (!ignore_oc && !ehci->ignore_oc)
  		mask = PORT_CSC | PORT_PEC | PORT_OCC;
  	else
  		mask = PORT_CSC | PORT_PEC;
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  			status |= USB_PORT_STAT_C_ENABLE << 16;
  
 -		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && !ignore_oc){
-+		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && (!ignore_oc || !ehci->ignore_oc)){
++		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && (!ignore_oc && !ehci->ignore_oc)){
  			status |= USB_PORT_STAT_C_OVERCURRENT << 16;
  
  			/*

target/linux/generic/patches-3.2/102-ehci_hcd_ignore_oc.patch

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
  	 * PORT_POWER; that's surprising, but maybe within-spec.
  	 */
 -	if (!ignore_oc)
-+	if (!ignore_oc || !ehci->ignore_oc)
++	if (!ignore_oc && !ehci->ignore_oc)
  		mask = PORT_CSC | PORT_PEC | PORT_OCC;
  	else
  		mask = PORT_CSC | PORT_PEC;
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  			status |= USB_PORT_STAT_C_ENABLE << 16;
  
 -		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && !ignore_oc){
-+		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && (!ignore_oc || !ehci->ignore_oc)){
++		if ((temp & PORT_OCC) && (!ignore_oc && !ehci->ignore_oc)){
  			status |= USB_PORT_STAT_C_OVERCURRENT << 16;
  
  			/*