|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
|
|
|
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
|
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
+# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+# NETGEAR EX6150v2 padding tool
|
|
|
+# (c) 2024 David Bauer <[email protected]>
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+import math
|
|
|
+import sys
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE = 64 * 1024
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+def read_field(data, offset):
|
|
|
+ return data[offset + 3] | data[offset + 2] << 8 | data[offset + 1] << 16 | data[offset] << 24
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
|
+ if len(sys.argv) != 3:
|
|
|
+ print('Usage: {} <input-image> <output-image>'.format(sys.argv[0]))
|
|
|
+ sys.exit(1)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ with open(sys.argv[1], 'rb') as f:
|
|
|
+ data = f.read()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ file_len = len(data)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # File-len in fdt header at offset 0x4
|
|
|
+ file_len_hdr = read_field(data, 0x4)
|
|
|
+ # String offset in fdt header at offset 0xc
|
|
|
+ str_off = read_field(data, 0xc)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ print("file_len={} hdr_file_len={} str_off={}".format(file_len, file_len_hdr, str_off))
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # Off to NETGEAR calculations - Taken from u-boot source (cmd_dni.c:2145)
|
|
|
+ #
|
|
|
+ # rootfs_addr = (ntohl(hdr->ih_size)/CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE+1) * CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_SECTOR_SIZE +
|
|
|
+ # 2*sizeof(image_header_t)-sizeof(image_header_t);
|
|
|
+ # rootfs_addr = rootfs_addr - (0x80 - mem_addr);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # NETGEAR did fuck up badly. The image uses a FIT header, while the calculation is done on a legacy header
|
|
|
+ # assumption. 'ih_size' matches 'off_dt_strings' of a fdt_header.
|
|
|
+ # From my observations, this seems to be fixed on newer bootloader versions.
|
|
|
+ # However, we need to be compatible with both.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # This presents a challenge: FDT_STR might end short of a block boundary, colliding with the rootfs_addr
|
|
|
+ #
|
|
|
+ # Our dirty solution:
|
|
|
+ # - Move the string_table to match a block_boundary.
|
|
|
+ # - Update the total file_len to end on 50% of a block boundary.
|
|
|
+ #
|
|
|
+ # This ensures all netgear calculations will be correct, regardless whether they are done based on the
|
|
|
+ # 'off_dt_strings' or 'totalsize' fields of a fdt header.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ new_dt_strings = int((math.floor(file_len / FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE) + 2) * FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE)
|
|
|
+ new_image_len = int(new_dt_strings + (FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE / 2))
|
|
|
+ new_file_len = int(new_dt_strings + FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE - 64)
|
|
|
+ print(f"new_file_len={new_file_len} new_hdr_file_len={new_image_len} new_str_offset={new_dt_strings}")
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # Convert data to bytearray
|
|
|
+ data = bytearray(data)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # Enlarge byte-array to new size
|
|
|
+ data.extend(bytearray(new_file_len - file_len))
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # Assert that the new and old string-tables are at least 256 bytes apart.
|
|
|
+ # We pad by two blocks, but let's be extra sure.
|
|
|
+ assert new_dt_strings - str_off >= 256
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # Move the string table to the new offset
|
|
|
+ for i in range(0, 256):
|
|
|
+ data[new_dt_strings + i] = data[str_off + i]
|
|
|
+ data[str_off + i] = 0
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # Update the string offset in the header
|
|
|
+ data[0xc] = (new_dt_strings >> 24) & 0xFF
|
|
|
+ data[0xd] = (new_dt_strings >> 16) & 0xFF
|
|
|
+ data[0xe] = (new_dt_strings >> 8) & 0xFF
|
|
|
+ data[0xf] = new_dt_strings & 0xFF
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # Update the file length in the header
|
|
|
+ data[0x4] = (new_image_len >> 24) & 0xFF
|
|
|
+ data[0x5] = (new_image_len >> 16) & 0xFF
|
|
|
+ data[0x6] = (new_image_len >> 8) & 0xFF
|
|
|
+ data[0x7] = new_image_len & 0xFF
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # Write the new file
|
|
|
+ with open(sys.argv[1] + '.new', 'wb') as f:
|
|
|
+ f.write(data)
|