| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233 |
- From dbd88e6fdd547cf8f6765b8dade9f89cf5c0ead9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
- From: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:38:10 +0100
- Subject: [PATCH] clk: Use clamp instead of open-coding our own
- The code in clk_set_rate_range() will, if the current rate is outside of
- the new range, force it to the minimum or maximum.
- Since it's running under the condition that the rate is either lower
- than the minimum, or higher than the maximum, this is equivalent to
- using clamp, while being less readable. Let's switch to using clamp
- instead.
- Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
- ---
- drivers/clk/clk.c | 6 +-----
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
- --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
- +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
- @@ -2386,11 +2386,7 @@ int clk_set_rate_range(struct clk *clk,
- * this corner case when determining the rate
- */
-
- - if (rate < min)
- - rate = min;
- - else
- - rate = max;
- -
- + rate = clamp(clk->core->req_rate, min, max);
- ret = clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, rate);
- if (ret) {
- /* rollback the changes */
|
